10/29/2022 0 Comments Charles booker![]() Paul, in particular, is driven by a libertarian philosophy and has argued for the end of many of the programs established during the New Deal.īecause of the electorate’s strong support for Republicans, Kentucky is often written off in Democratic circles as a “deep red” state. This kind of political engagement seems impossible to imagine today in a state like Kentucky, which ranked 44th in citizen public engagement prior to the 2020 election, and whose two current senators, Mitch McConnell and Rand Paul, are among the most devoted curtailers of the role of the federal government. McGrath lost by almost 19% after running a campaign that cost a whopping $94 million. ![]() Unsurprisingly, trying to flank Republicans from the right has been an unsuccessful tactic in Kentucky-and most of the South. In the 1932 presidential election, which was seen as a bellwether for Roosevelt’s New Deal policies, 67% of all Kentuckians voted, far exceeding the national average participation rate and doubling the rate of many other Southern states. “Kentuckians received better answers from the federal government than from their traditional self-reliance and state leaders,” Blakely writes. As Blakely explains, Kentucky’s members of Congress were almost universally supportive of Roosevelt’s plans, and most regular Kentuckians embraced many of the New Deal programs without reservations. Blakely in his 1986 book Hard Times and New Deal in Kentucky 1929- 1939. In Kentucky, New Deal programs were particularly successful, with $650 million (adjusted for inflation, that’s over $13 billion in today’s currency) spent on projects in the commonwealth alone, according to George T. And those changes were incredibly popular, with many of the programs, such as Social Security, still counted among the most popular governmental programs in the nation. ![]() With bottom-up pressure from a rapidly growing and increasingly militant labor movement, the programs that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt proposed under the New Deal banner instituted some of the largest changes to working-class Americans’ material conditions in the country’s history. He vied for the Democratic nomination to take on Minority Leader Mitch McConnell in 2020, but ultimately lost to moderate Democrat Amy McGrath, who wound up spending over $90 million to lose to McConnell by nearly 20 points.The New Deal is often held up as the zenith of Democratic success in the United States-and for good reason. His bid to take down Paul is already his second run at the Senate. “This bill would cheapen the meaning of lynching by defining it so broadly as to include a minor bruise or abrasion,” Paul argued on the Senate floor.īooker, 37, is a progressive Democrat who has represented Kentucky’s 37th District in the House since 2019. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Kamala Harris (D-Calif.). Paul did indeed singlehandedly block the anti-lynching bill in 2020, prompting a rash of pushback from lawmakers like Sens. Paul did indeed call the Civil Rights Act into question (although he later said he would have voted for it). ![]() Paul did indeed equate believing in the right to health care to believing in “enslaving” doctors and other hospital workers. The person who singlehandedly blocked an anti-lynching act from becoming federal law.” ![]() The person who said he would have opposed the Civil Rights Act. “The very person who compared expanded health care to slavery. “In Kentucky, like many states throughout the South, lynching was a tool of terror. “The pain of our past persists to this day,” Booker says. Paul’s opponent, who is Black, released a campaign ad on Wednesday in which he puts a noose around his neck. Paul is up for reelection this year, and though he voted in favor of the version of the bill that passed earlier this year, Democrat Charles Booker is calling out his initial objection to making lynching a hate crime. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) didn’t singlehandedly block its passage in the summer of 2020 - just days after George Floyd was murdered by police in Minnesota. The bill, which designates lynching as a hate crime punishable by up to 30 years in prison, would have gone into effect sooner if Sen. The Emmett Till Antilynching Act passed through Congress in March, with all but three Republicans voting for it in the House of Representatives and the Senate approving it unanimously. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |